CO129-258 - Governor Sir Robinson - 1893 [1-4] — Page 589

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

504

From the enclosed statements it will be seen that on the 1st of January 1892 the value of the stores in the Water and Drainage Branch was $75,302.21 whilst that in Public Works Department store was $21,759.35, the former has been reduced during the year to $32,248.43 and the latter increased to $66,924.07 making a total decrease of $7,939.06.

4. It will be observed that the value of the stores transferred to Public Works Department from Water and Drainage Branch appears in the Statement of Public Works Department as $38,048.08 whilst in that of the Water and Drainage Branch as $39,378.43 showing an apparent discrepancy of $1,330.35. To the extent of $545.98 this is owing to certain stores having been carried to account in the Water and Drainage Branch in December 1892 but not carried to account in the Public Works Department till January 1893; the remaining $284.37 is accounted for by certain stores issued by the Water and Drainage Branch being debited direct to the votes and not passed through the Public Works Department Store Account.

The account with the Crown Agents in the case of the Water and Drainage Branch shows an excess valuation of $1,496.00 that is to say the stores received during the year have been placed on the Store books at a total valuation of $1,496.00 more than they have actually cost. On the other hand it appears that in the case of the Public Works Department stores there is an under valuation amounting to $8,200.59 which I regret to say is not satisfactory and seems to require adjustment.

Edit History

2026-05-27 00:11:57 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
504 From the enclosed statements it will be seen that on the 1st of January 1892 the value of the stores in the Water and Drainage Branch was $75,302.21 whilst that in Public Works Department store was $21,759.35, the former has been reduced during the year to $32,248.43 and the latter increased to $66,924.07 making a total decrease of $7,939.06. 4. It will be observed that the value of the stores transferred to Public Works Department from Water and Drainage Branch appears in the Statement of Public Works Department as $38,048.08 whilst in that of the Water and Drainage Branch as $39,378.43 showing an apparent discrepancy of $1,330.35. To the extent of $545.98 this is owing to certain stores having been carried to account in the Water and Drainage Branch in December 1892 but not carried to account in the Public Works Department till January 1893; the remaining $284.37 is accounted for by certain stores issued by the Water and Drainage Branch being debited direct to the votes and not passed through the Public Works Department Store Account. The account with the Crown Agents in the case of the Water and Drainage Branch shows an excess valuation of $1,496.00 that is to say the stores received during the year have been placed on the Store books at a total valuation of $1,496.00 more than they have actually cost. On the other hand it appears that in the case of the Public Works Department stores there is an under valuation amounting to $8,200.59 which I regret to say is not satisfactory and seems to require adjustment.
Baseline (Original)
504 From the enclosed statements it will be seen that on the 1st of January 1892 the value of the stores in the Water and Drainage Branch was. $75,302.21 whilst that in Public Works $21,759.35, the Department store was former has been redness devring the a. year to $32.248.43 and the latter increased to $66.924.07 making total decrease of $7.939.06. 4. It will be observes that the value of the stores transferred to In. blic Works Department from Water awn Drainage Branch appears in the St is Statement Public Works De- partment as $38048.08 whilst in that of the Water and Pravirage Branch as $39378.43 Shaving apparent dis- crepancy of $830.35 . To the extent of $545.98 this is aving to certain stores. having been carried to account an the Water and Drainage Branch in Decem December 1892 account in the Public Works Depart. but not carried to ment till January 1893; the remain. ing $284.37 is accounted for by cer. tain store issued Praviage Brandl by the Water and being debited direct to the votes and not passed through the Public Works Department Store Account. کی Agents The recount with the Crown in the case of the Water and Branch shows an excess Graciage valuation of $1496.00 that is to the stores received du have been during say The year on the Store books ca av placed at o total valuation of $ 1496.00 more than they have actually cost in the actually other hand that in the case of the Public Works Department stores shews unide valuation an amounting to 78,200.59 which I regret to say satisfactory is not and seems to require ad_ Justment
2026-05-27 00:11:57 · Baseline
View content

504

From the enclosed statements

it will be seen that on

the 1st of January

1892 the value of the stores in the

Water and

Drainage

Branch was.

$75,302.21 whilst that in Public Works

$21,759.35, the

Department store was former has been redness

devring the

a.

year to $32.248.43 and the latter increased to $66.924.07 making total decrease of $7.939.06.

4.

It will be observes that the

value of

the stores transferred to In. blic Works Department from Water

awn

Drainage Branch appears in

the St is Statement Public Works De- partment as $38048.08 whilst in that

of the Water and

Pravirage Branch

as

$39378.43 Shaving apparent dis- crepancy of $830.35 . To the extent of

$545.98 this is

aving

to certain stores.

having been carried to account an

the Water and Drainage

Branch in

Decem

December

1892 account in the Public Works Depart.

but not carried to

ment till January 1893; the remain.

ing

$284.37 is accounted for by cer.

tain store issued

Praviage

Brandl

by

the Water and

being

debited direct

to the votes and not passed through the Public Works Department Store Account.

کی

Agents

The recount with the Crown in the case of the Water and

Branch shows an excess

Graciage

valuation of $1496.00 that is to

the stores received du

have been

during

say

The year

on the Store books

ca av

placed

at o total valuation of $ 1496.00 more than they

have actually cost in

the actually other hand that in the case of the Public Works Department stores shews

unide

valuation an

amounting to 78,200.59 which I regret to say

satisfactory

is not

and seems to require ad_

Justment

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.